Skip to content

House in a Garden

11 November – 30 December 2021

Jhaveri Contemporary, Mumbai

Click here for more information.

Installation view, House in a Garden, 2021.
Courtesy of the artist and Jhaveri Contemporary.
Photography © Mohammed Chiba.

Installation view, House in a Garden, 2021.
Courtesy of the artist and Jhaveri Contemporary.
Photography © Mohammed Chiba.

Installation view, House in a Garden, 2021.
Courtesy of the artist and Jhaveri Contemporary.
Photography © Mohammed Chiba.

Installation view, House in a Garden, 2021.
Courtesy of the artist and Jhaveri Contemporary.
Photography © Mohammed Chiba.

Installation view, House in a Garden, 2021.
Courtesy of the artist and Jhaveri Contemporary.
Photography © Mohammed Chiba.

Soft Concrete

Alongside overtures to produce concrete in South Asia during periods leading to independence for some nations, or throughout a slow burn of resigned civil strife in others, modern architecture established connections to larger scale infrastructural networks at play. It was also a means to counter— or extend—the provocations that these buildings made material. The establishment of a new architecture for South Asia, if not an extension of all independence movements in the world, became as much a closing in (on people, on the production of value) as a fervent attempt to display an openness to iterations of modernism and its latent spirituality of capital largesse. Yet profound fissures remained ever-present at the peripheries of these movements, as with the nations that contained them. For Shezad Dawood, what was one—with the identification of an East that spanned to a West Pakistan, today’s Pakistan, and Bangladesh—became two; a split foregrounding how and why the presence of systems that inform modernist architecture in both countries take on new meanings today.

In this exhibition, two rooms re-situate a body of works by London-based Dawood that confer, in their dispersal and return to India, a historical narrative arc for the artist that begins with a questioning of home and Nation: a politics conceived by and through spaces. Included are series that may be understood as complementary to each other, or as is the case with the diasporic, as talking back. Does the nascent materiality in these works intimate lost hope? A potential yet to come? An attempt at decolonizing the visual and spatial arenas of modern urbanity?

Kantha textiles—often constructed through leftovers—speak to the ways in which cast-off components reconstitute spaces and identities. Considered one of the oldest forms of sewing, kantha is not only an amalgam of running stitches but also an assembly of less useful panels, with multiple layers built atop one another and often remade into blankets. Kantha, as both suggesting a stitch as well as broad naming convention today for the textiles, takes on techniques of recycling that holistically remake as much as rebuild the elements that create them. In Dawood’s works, the running stitch is a continuous line built from smaller lines and these stitches effect dashes, columns, grids—the there, but not there condition of a conventional architectural drawing. The dash, as stitch and structure, represents what may be above or below a given condition. These are the syllabary of (modernist) architecture. While these stitches keep the individual pieces together, they also effect a superimposition, or embodied agency, that unifies the stitch, the subjects that produce them, and their intentionality.

Much like architecture, kantha is a syncretic form of assemblage that addresses the continuous production of things. Transmitted across generational as well as physical divides, kantha are continually being mended and repaired with their use and display. Here, we are privy to an assembly of temporalities whose life cycles as labors have been arrested, if only momentarily. As all buildings degrade over time, those that are visualized among these works are not understood through their misuse, climate, or materiality, but through a reckoning with these conditions. For Dawood, the subsequent disappearance of modern architecture in South Asia alludes to a more generalized entropy of socio-political norms that once attempted to present a future while relegating the past to the edges. For Dawood, kantha is a strategy.

As part of Dawood’s large scale project Encroachments, first shown as part of the Sharjah Biennial 14 (2019) and following at the Lahore Biennial (2020), the use of denim as much as language binds the limits of sovereignty to movements of people and goods. Such material circulates but generally in one direction. Evoking the “illegal” structures established on and around private and State properties, for Dawood, the encroachments are complex spatial forms associated with a shadow architecture that transgresses conventional reception. Accompanied by small graphic paintings that deploy rhetorical gestures concerning US-Pakistan relations during the Cold War, a set of denim paintings invokes both the former US Consulate in Karachi as well as traces of other occupations.

In 1959, Los Angeles-based Austrian architect and émigré Richard Neutra designed Pakistan’s United States Embassy in Karachi which later became a Consulate. But the complex soon became disused once the new capital was moved to the Margalla Hills and what would become Islamabad. Long dormant, the Consulate and adjacent warehouse were recently proposed for sale and assumed to be slated for demolition. The local populace found little application for the low-slung shimmering concrete and brick shells that hold one corner of the Bagh-e-Jinnah in central Karachi. That this building and its significance within the history of global modernisms was considered negligible amplifies it as an arbiter of transnational political relations. While Pakistan had its share of foreign-born architects working to establish and build a new image of the nation, including Louis I Kahn, Edward Durrell Stone and Michel Écochard, a precarious stability provided by initial leaders such as Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Iskander Mirza was subsequently upended through a coup orchestrated by General Ayub Khan. Dawood’s denim paintings, including Neutral Density (2018) and Defender II (2018), allude to the inchoate fallibilities of a US-borne aesthetic hegemony wrought through alignments established with other nations, rendered as convergent yet incomplete geometries, figures, and surfaces.

Dawood counters aspects of abstraction in those paintings with and on denim by insisting that they are extensions of sensing and thinking beings involved in the works’ production. Imaging modernist configurations, including those of the US, these (re)productive surfaces elicit the connectivities of laboring bodies and the institutional structures that supplant them. For both sets of works, the artist employs contrasting textiles as a method through which the embodiment of loss turns on the vagaries of concrete, at once fixing and dislocating the visual field. The conceit of concrete as instantiating both the material and intellectual proof associated with these systems of power remains as the substance of isolated visibilities. Dawood’s experiential, embodied approaches challenge the antinomies of modern architecture as a coalescing of objective truths.

First brought together for the 2019 Frieze Live and subsequently at the 2020 Dhaka Art Summit in Bangladesh in an exhibition entitled: Muzharul Islam: Surfacing Intention, the works that establish Dawood’s University of NonDualism are linked to the architecture of Muzharul Islam, Bangladesh’s pioneering modernist architect. Concerned with Islam’s dismantling of spatial and societal binaries, the artist hung the work from the ceiling in two rows, between which the visitor meandered. Seen frontally, the panels presented the plans—or should we say, the image-trace of plans—while on their verso, the kantha paneling, stitching and color blocks remained intact. One could see each panel visually folding into another, arranged as if delimiting the boundaries of a proscenium through which the viewer passed.

The representation of architectural forms was not apparent on the rear of the panels. In making visible the simultaneity of front and back, the distinct monumentality of these buildings and the larger institutions they evoke, are subverted while still remaining palpable. With works such as House in a Garden II (2019), the principal elements of the ground plan for Muzharul Islam’s 1948 Dhaka Art School, now the Faculty of Fine Arts at the University of Dhaka, float in a rich geometry of hues and line-making, propelling the viewer’s bodily absorption. Through patterning and assembly, individual panels reassure as both banners and agents of security, announcing a way to consider softness not as oppositional. Rather, these textile works are a metaphor for the processes through which human diplomacy invites the design and care of collaborative systems, social maintenance, and interdependent spaces.

Softness establishes forms of reciprocity.

The works' empaneling offers discrete views of architectural plans and elevations—the “plan”—that, when made vertical, encourages audiences to understand these forms as maps. Akin to the museal display of ancient mosaics as pictures, with their inversion from ground to wall and back again, each of these works – volumetric drawings made fluid with embroidered surfaces of colorful textiles–manifests as a hybrid of painting-sculpture. They are informed by a sensitivity to the calculus of meanings that govern the building-events represented. Each panel presents one site as contested, evolving. The buildings referenced may be regarded as moribund, a faded resoluteness for which entropy connotes as much about the concrete used as their infrequent occupation. These supple architectures posit the ways in which use and value are intertwined, thereby redefining the permanence of an image and the image of permanence.

Dawood is invested in unfolding a constellation of meanings that undergird modernist architecture and its attendant spaces. Yet, instability pervades works such as those found in the Encroachments series. How does loss—of self, of Nation—incite critical responses to those systems in which modernism’s afterlives continue to reduce, and diminish the individual and the collective? These works offer a way forward emboldened by softness, by the propensity to touch the spatial, to feel the institutional, and to delight in shared beginnings. Each elicits a palpable reversal of the economic and political orders that pervade institution-building throughout the world today. In Dawood’s hands, the textile, as limitless garment, as transient architecture, as scaleless and scale-full, acknowledges how entangled questions of labor, production and identity remain embedded within their deep surfaces.

Sean Anderson
Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Cornell University Director, Bachelors of Architecture Program, Cornell University Ithaca, New York

Related

India Art Fair
2022
Jhaveri Contemporary, India Art Fair, New Delhi
Risquons-Tout
2020—2021
WIELS, Brussels
A (Night)
2020
Glazed ceramic, 48 × 20 × 21 cm
Circulation
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 250 × 172 cm
Context
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 227 × 178 cm
H (Night)
2020
Glazed ceramic, 56 × 40 × 20 cm
In the Night Garden (Study)
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 70 × 60 cm
J
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 155 × 130 cm
Jaipurhat Clouds (Study)
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 70 × 60 cm
Jaipurhat Daytime (Study)
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 70 × 60 cm
Jaipurhat by Night (Study)
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 70 × 60 cm
O
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 155 × 130 cm
Overhangs
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 215 × 150 cm
P
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 130 × 155 cm
R
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 155 × 130 cm
Situated Architecture
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 197 × 188 cm
Solid and Voids
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 194 × 154 cm
Square Day (Study)
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 70 × 60 cm
U
2020
Acrylic on vintage textile, 155 × 130 cm
Y (Day)
2020
Glazed ceramic, 48 × 20 × 21 cm
University of NonDualism, Frieze LIVE
2019
Frieze LIVE, London
Architectural Room Divider (Bera)
2019
Acrylic screenprint on canvas in artist’s teak frame structure, frame: 123.5 × 275 × 9.3 cm, Framed canvases: 114.3 × 169.3 cm
House in a Garden I
2019
Vintage textile collage, 92 × 75 cm
House in a Garden II
2019
Vintage textile collage, 92 × 75 cm
Institute of Fine Arts
2019
Vintage textile collage and acrylic, 155 × 184.5 cm
NAB I
2019
Vintage textile collage and acrylic, 150 × 113 cm
NAB II
2019
Vintage textile collage, 150 × 113 cm
Pavilion-Archetype
2019
Vintage textile collage and acrylic, with stainless steel hanging system, 174 × 217 cm
University
2019
Vintage textile collage and acrylic, with stainless steel hanging system, 184.5 × 145 cm
University of NonDualism
2019
Super 8 and HD, 3'30"